Another Vet Visit

I called my vet nearly three weeks ago to schedule an appointment for my dog, Benji.  I take him every two months to get shots for his allergies.  When I called I was told the vet was out for the week (I assume spring break) and it was scheduled for late the next week.

Well, that next week was the week all the storms were coming through.  We were in the area where severe storms and tornadoes were expected.  We were fortunate in that we ended up being on the bubble - just outside where all the tornadoes actually hit, but that wasn't a given and we were playing it by ear all week.  So, when my appointment date arrived, I called and asked to reschedule it.  I also added an appointment for Oreo because he had been licking his foot for a week at that point.  He tends to get grass seeds stuck between his toes and the vet has to fish them out and I wanted him to look at his foot to see if that was the issue - and if so, treat it as necessary.

Today was the first appointment they had available, so I took it.  By this morning though, Oreo had stopped licking his foot for at least a few days and I assumed it had resolved itself.  But, given the appointment time, I wasn't sure the receptionist had booked a time for both dogs.

When we got to the vet's office and were called back, the vet tech had Oreo get on the table and took his temperature.  I thought it was a little odd but didn't say anything.  The vet tech went to leave the room and stopped himself and said he probably should do a fecal test.  I asked why he was doing a fecal test and his response was "it's probably his anal glands".  I asked what he thought Oreo was there for (as he took the fecal matter) and he repeated that it was probably just his anal glands.

I responded that Oreo was there because of a hurt foot (not sure why I worded it that way, but it is what I said).  He said he'd have to go check the record to see what it said.

Turns out, when I told the receptionist that he was licking his foot again, she noted that he had a leaky butt!  I guess I can see how that mistake could be made and it all worked out in the end (no pun intended!).

The vet looked at his foot and he could see the place he had been licking and assumed the grass seed (which was the diagnosis) had already worked itself out but he had an abscess there that was ready to pop so he popped it, gave him a shot and sent me home with antibiotics that I will have to force feed Oreo.

Benji also got his shot and cried out in pain - worse than he has in the past and pulled away so not all of it went into him.  It looked like a good amount was left but the vet tech said it was a small amount and didn't matter.  So, hopefully it will be okay.  Benji immediately forgave the vet tech for hurting him but Oreo . . . he's not as forgiving.  😉

Vet Visit

 I want to preface this by saying, I'm told both dogs will be fine.

That said, I got home just a short while ago from the vet's office.  I took two dogs in and came home with only one of them

Last week I had taken Benji in to get his allergy (steroid) shot.  While at the vet's office then, I scheduled a full blood work up on both dogs for today.  I used to take Harley in every three to four months for full blood work ups, urinalysis and fecal tests because he was on daily pills that contained small amounts of steroids for his allergies and I wanted to be sure all was okay with him (because I hadn't been doing that and his liver enzymes shot through the roof and several other "allergy" treatments were not good options for him, so I tracked him regularly so it didn't get to the point it had that one time).

When I scheduled it, I got grilled about why I wanted to do it.  I was told their shots were do in June or July and didn't I just want to wait until then to do the tests?  I said no, I didn't want to wait and said that Oreo, while not acting like he was sick particularly, did seem more needy and was seeming to be having some bladder control issues and I just wanted to be sure he was okay.  I mentioned I also wanted fecal tests and urinalysis - if we could get it.  I said the urinalysis specifically on Oreo but I meant everything else for both dogs.  And said I wanted Benji tested because of the steroids.

So, I get there and they take Oreo's temperature (it was normal) and did a fecal on him - they didn't do either on Benji.  The vet comes in and examines Oreo (although not like a wellness exam like I had intended, but like one that they were checking his kidneys out, since I wanted to be sure that was all okay) - again, they didn't do this to Benji.

The vet drew the blood out of Oreo's neck and tried to get a urine sample directly from his bladder / kidney but came up empty.  He took Benji's blood from his leg.  And then I had to wait for the results.

A few minutes later the vet tech came in and said we were going to walk Oreo to try to collect a urine sample.  I went out with Benji too.  Long story short, Benji peed twice (even though he'd peed when we arrived) and pooped - Oreo did nothing.  So I was put back into the room to wait again.

Fortunately I had taken my tablet with me so that I could read because I know it takes time to get the results back and they usually will see another patient before they come back.  But the vet tech comes back and tells me that Benji - not Oreo - has an infection, based on his lab work.  Oreo is a bit dehydrated but it doesn't seem to be a big deal and they say he doesn't need to be given fluids when I specifically ask about it when the vet comes back into the room to insert a catheter into Oreo to get a urine sample that way.

And again, I wait.  When the vet tech came in that time he said "we're going to keep Oreo today".

What?????  I asked some questions and those few minutes are a bit of a fog to me but, as it turns out, the urinalysis (thank goodness they got that!) showed that not only was he dehydrated but that he had the beginnings of a UTI!  So those fluids I'd asked about and they said he didn't need were suddenly important for him to get!  I didn't fully understand how he's getting the fluids (IV I think he said?) rather than the way other vets have done it where you can essentially see where the fluids are and they go home with you.  They said I can pick him up around 3:00 or 3:30.

Oreo did NOT want to stay!  He crawled under the chair and wouldn't come out.  Poor guy!

Anyway, so I asked if I paid the full thing then or for part of it now and part when I picked up Oreo and was told I could pay the full thing when I picked up Oreo.

So I left and decided to take Benji to the park and walk him, right?  It had been the plan to take them both to the park and walk them after the visit but, well, it didn't work out that way.  I take my fanny pack to the park to keep my keys, ID and phone with me so I went to pull it out of what I call my "doctor's bag" that I take to office visits and has my tablet and stuff in it.  Turns out, I hadn't taken it with me!  Benji was so antsy  before we left (with excitement because he knows when I transfer stuff into my fanny pack that we're going to the park!) and because I took my tablet, I totally forgot my fanny pack with my ID, phone and checkbook (because they charge more if you pay by credit card).  I couldn't have paid them then if I had wanted to.  Oh, and my ID wasn't in my wallet either, plus I'd run out without my glasses (which is a driving restriction on my license)!

Anyway, I'm told both dogs will be okay.  I was sent home with antibiotics for Benji and I don't know if I will get any for Oreo but he's having to endure being at the vet for several hours (poor boy!). 

I had hoped it would be a visit where the vet thinks I'm nuts for running all these tests on my dogs but that I get some peace of mine but, as it turns out, I NEEDED to take them so I'm so glad I did!  But it's made for an exhausting day already!

Book Review

 Last night I started a new book:  The Patient's Secret by Loreth Anne White.  I'm not 100% certain how I came to have this ebook but, given the email trail I have, I think in December after I "purchased" one of Amazon's First book picks, I was offered another book from a selection of books.  This book has 30k+ reviews on amazon and 4.5 stars.  On goodreads (as noted on amazon) it has over 53k reviews and 4.3 stars.  To me, when you have that many reviews and that high a rating, it's worth taking a look at.  And I think that's how I came to have it, but I'm not certain.

Anyway, last night, around midnight or so, I had a distraction occur that took some time or I would've finished the book last night.  I only had 30 minutes or so left in the book when I finally decided I had to go to sleep around 2:00 in the morning.  First thing when I got up, I finished the book.  It was one I didn't want to put down.  And here's the thing, I was already reading another book (which I think was the December book I'd picked that effectively got me this one).  That book I had no problem putting down - at all.  I was reading it yesterday and realized I didn't care about any of the characters and I didn't care if they reached their goals or if anyone fell in love.  I also didn't care if I never finished it.  So I set it aside for The Patient's Secret.

The story is about a woman who falls off a cliff at a beach and dies after a struggle on the cliff.  That happens in a prologue (I started a book this morning and it's the third book in a row that I've read that has a prologue - is that a requirement now?  ;) ).  From that point, the story is told in alternating points of view (third person, although I felt there was some head hopping), going back and forth in time to before the event that left the woman dead and how it's being processed in real time.  During the telling of the story, you learn that a lot of people had a reason to want the woman dead or at least out of their lives.

And everyone had secrets.  I felt like the story was showing how as much as you might think you know someone - even if you're married to them for years and years - you don't know everything about them.

The story was based on a nugget of truth.  In Canada (where the book is also based), if a minor commits a crime - no matter how awful of a crime - they cannot be sentenced to more than ten years incarceration.  They can also have their records expunged after a few years after they are released from prison.  

This book fictionalizes a real event that occurred in Canada.  The Preface of the book says that the inspiration for the fictional book is a real crime but that what is spun around it is purely fictional.

It was a really good book.  As I said, I didn't want to put it down.  However, that all said, I did have a bit of an issue with the behavior of an eight year old in the book.  I'll just say, the author had him behaving like someone who was much older.  It was hard to suspend disbelief to believe he was doing - and thinking - the things he was doing - and thinking.  But other than that - very good book.  I highly recommend it and thank whatever it was that pointed me into getting (and ultimately reading, because I do have a LOT to choose from!) this book!

Things That Go Bump in the Night

 The other day I started reading a book.  In the first chapter (a prologue I think) someone is killed at their beach house.  It's presented in a way that makes it sound like it's very secluded (although, later in the book someone breaks into the house and doesn't want to turn on the lights because the neighbors will see them).

For those of you that know me, I may have mentioned that the house I currently live in is very secluded.  You can't see it from the road and there are no neighbors that can see the house (or hear me if I were to scream).

That's a picture of my "driveway" above.  A pizza delivery guy once called me and asked me for directions to my house from the spot where this was taken.  I told him to just follow it and that my house was the only thing at the end of that "drive / road".

Anyway, so I was reading this book that killed off a character in the opening pages of the book.  Then, a few nights later - for the first time in the three years that I've lived here - I heard something just outside of the fence that sounded like a human walking in the woods.  It was around 3 in the morning (Oreo wanted out) and it freaked me out.  Oreo growled and it stopped.  Then it started moving again.  That happened a couple of times and I fought the urge to call out because I wasn't in a position to defend myself.  I felt it better to hope that they would just move on if I didn't acknowledge them.

This happened several nights in a row at different areas of the property - just outside of the fence each time.  I've heard animals move around in the woods around my house but nothing has ever sounded like this before.  Despite that, I worked hard to convince myself that it was some kind of animal.

Then, a couple of  nights ago I took Oreo out and he was moving around in front of the house where there is a pile up of leaves and it sounded like what I'd heard around the property.  I felt such relief because now I could tell myself - and believe it could be true - that it was an animal I had been hearing, even though I've never heard that in the three years I've lived here.

Well, earlier today I went out with the dogs.  Near the area where I first heard sounds outside of the fence, there was what looked like a large gatorade bottle on the ground!  I suppose it's possible that it could've been littered somewhere else and the weather blew it near my house.  Or even an animal could've brought it there, chewing on it or playing with it like a toy.  But, given the rest of the circumstances that have been present this past week, I'm not as convinced (again) that it was an animal.

I love the privacy I have because of the seclusion of the house but, in times like this, living on top of each other has its benefits too!

Just saying!

Why I voted for Kamala Harris

I cast my first vote in Arkansas yesterday and I cast it for Kamala Harris.

It really wasn’t a vote for Kamala as much as it was a vote against Donald Trump.  If I’m really going to be honest here, if I were to make a list of people I would like to serve in the White House, Kamala probably wouldn’t make the top ten on my list.  So why am I voting for her instead of Trump?  Well, let me tell you.

I’ll start by putting aside the fact that he’s a convicted felon.  I’ll follow that by ignoring the fact that he doesn’t qualify for security clearance and wouldn’t get it if he ran for any other office except for the presidency.  I’ll even set aside, and put in the corner, the fact that he’s been found liable for sexual assault and fraud, and bankrupted a number of companies (including a casino!) and stole from a charity that was advertised as being for children with cancer.  I’m just going to pretend none of those facts exist in my decision not to vote for Trump.  Also in the corner, not being considered here, is the fact that he has stated that he will be a dictator on day one (I know he said it would only be for one day but anyone that has been paying attention knows it won’t end on day one!) or that he intends to do away with the constitution, or at least parts of it that don’t serve his selfish purposes.  Nor am I considering that he believes he is immune from any accountability for any crimes he’s ever committed, regardless if it was before, during or after his presidency.  His obvious cognitive decline?  Not in consideration here either.  Also off limits in this decision is the fact that Trump benefitted financially from his time in office – at taxpayer expense.

What else is there to consider you might ask.  Well let me tell you.

During the debate between Trump and Harris, Trump was asked a question and he went off topic and started yelling about Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, saying they were stealing and eating the pets of American citizens.  He was told that the City Manager had been contacted and told ABC reporters that there was no credible evidence to support those allegations.  Trump’s response was that that was probably a nice thing for the City Manager to say but that he had seen reports of it on television.  The moderator again pointed out that there was no credible evidence to support those claims and said he wasn’t basing it on something shown on television but by officials in the city.

Since then, the Mayor of Springfield and the governor of the state have also publicly stated that the claims are unfounded.

Also since then, Trump’s running mate, J.D. Vance, admitted that he “created” the story to get the media talking about the issue of immigration.  He’s also said that whether or not it’s true isn’t important, even though the claims resulted in bomb threats being made in Springfield and schools and businesses had to be evacuated as a result.  Neither Trump nor Vance has apologized for their deliberate false claims about Haitians in Springfield, who, by the way, are there legally.  Instead, Trump has vowed to revoke their protected status and deport them, if he gets re-elected and continues to say they are eating people’s pets.

When Trump was in office, he lied to the American people about covid and it cost hundreds of thousands of American lives unnecessarily.  He knew it was serious but he deliberately downplayed it because he thought it would be bad for him politically.  At one point he suggested injecting or drinking bleach could kill the virus.  When he was called out on it, he said he was “joking” and trying to get a rise out of the media.  One of his former aides said that Trump downplayed the benefits of wearing a mask because one time when he wore a mask, his orange makeup came off on the mask and he didn’t want the public to see that so he demonized the wearing of masks from that point forward.  He actively put American lives in jeopardy for vanity and political reasons having nothing to do with what was in the best interests of the American people.

Something else he did while in office related to the pandemic is he had dismantled the team Obama put together to help combat a potential future pandemic after ebola hit while Obama was in office.  He also withheld aid from states that he felt weren’t sufficiently “grateful” to him.  I remember one state ordering masks from another country.  They had made the White House aware of it and Kushner intercepted the delivery – even though the state had paid for it – and then tried to sell the supplies back to the state again.  Another state ordered supplies but didn’t tell the White House – Trump called them ungrateful and disgraceful for having done that, despite what Trump had previously done to other states.

But the bottom line here is that facts matter.  Trump lied to Americans during covid because he thought the truth would hurt him politically and American citizens died because of his lies.  He was embarrassed by his ridiculous claim about injecting bleach so he said he was joking.  Do Americans really want / need a president who would “joke” about something so serious?  No!  We need someone who will take such things seriously and who will listen to the experts and be willing to admit when they’ve made a mistake.

He also spreads lies that he thinks will help him politically – like saying Haitians are eating people’s pets and saying it’s true because he saw it on television.  Shouldn’t an American president be willing to get at the truth of things before stating things as facts?  Shouldn’t they take the word of a City Manager, a City Mayor and a state governor over something he sees on television?  Do we really want a president who will just state things that are false when he makes clear he doesn’t have – and is not interested in having – all the facts?  Or a president who withholds the truth – at the American public’s expense – because he thinks the truth will hurt him politically?  America needs a leader who is willing to admit they are wrong and are willing to lose their “job” because they’ve done the right thing – not someone who is only self serving and wants to hold office to line his own pockets at taxpayer expense.

So, that’s why I voted for Kamala Harris, even though she isn’t in my top ten of choices of people I would want to hold the office of the President of the United States.  And, for what it’s worth, I feel it’s worth noting that even though Kamala is not in the top ten of my choices, Trump doesn’t even make the list –period.  As I keep saying, I wouldn’t vote for Trump if he was running unopposed and a gun was being held to my head.

Here’s to hoping Kamala wins in a landslide on election day and that Trump disappears into oblivion!

VOTE!

Curbside pickup

 I don't know exactly when I learned about curbside pickup but I'm certain I didn't really understand how it worked until at least the summer of 2020, during the pandemic.  Once I discovered it I found that I love it!  It's so easy to just drive up and get your order.

Of course, like anything else, there are pros and cons to curbside pickup.  A pro is that you don't end up with the impulse buys you might end up with if you did the shopping yourself.  A con is that if you forget to include something you need on your order, you're not going to be in the store to see it and have that "aha" moment and end up getting what you need.  Another con is that I've ended up with items I wouldn't have bought if I'd done the shopping myself.  An example would be leafy greens.  I believe it was collard greens.  I ordered a leafy green and what I was sent home with looked like something that was one day away from needing to be thrown out - if that.  Right now I have a sweet potato that came with a good chunk of one end of it that needs to be cut off because it's not good.  And then there are the substitutions.  Most are okay but some are like "how did you come up with that from what I ordered?"

But with all that said, the thing that really bothers me is the grocery bag situation.  The place I get my groceries recently started offering to bag the groceries at the car, if you bring your own reuseable bags - which I do.  The number of bags I have has dwindled some because they've been abused by sackers.  I think I have 9 left, which usually is enough for my orders.

The problem is that these people seem to be trained to overstuff the bags for some reason.  I take all my bags with me and get home to find four are stuffed so full that there is a risk the straps will tear when I lift it.  The other five will be empty.  I mean, what is the point in that?  I've started telling people when they bring my groceries out to fill as many as possible.  I forgot to tell the person that today and she left me with I believe three empty bags.  Meanwhile, my bread was just thrown in the trunk without being put in a bag.  Like, what's up with that?

Now, the thing is, if I hadn't checked that I was bringing my own bags and they had bagged them in the store, I would have my groceries divided into 75 different bags instead of the four they crammed them into at the car!  

Maybe it's just me but I wish there was a happy medium here!  Just saying!

Medication Advertisements

 I record most things I want to watch so that I can watch them at a later time, fast forwarding through the commercials. 

But every now and then I catch a commercial advertising some drug.  I usually miss what the medication is for but hear the long list of possible side effects, and wonder if the side effects are worth what it supposedly helps.

To put it in perspective, years ago I had a dog that was allergic to everything.  He was on a medication that had a low dose steroid in it, as well as an anti-histamine.  Even though it was a low dose steroid, over time it caused issues and I had to take them off of them and try something else to help with his allergies.

The first "drug" a "specialist" prescribed for him almost killed him and I took him off of it.  So the specialist prescribed something else for him - a people medication that's used when a person has an organ transplant.

The side effects listed were mostly standard, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, etc.  It also could cause "severe" headaches, which I didn't like because it wasn't like he could tell me his head hurt.  But the one that was a deal breaker for me (even though I had already paid an obscene amount for the drug when I found out) was that it can cause cancer.  Cancer!

I mentioned that this was to treat his allergies, right?  Yeah.  I wasn't going to run the risk of giving my dog cancer, just so his allergies wouldn't bother him!  That was a side effect that wasn't worth the risk to me.

But back to the commercial ads for drugs.  One day I caught what the drug being pushed was for and what else they told you you would have to do while taking the drug.

The drug "helps" prevent HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.  You have to test negative for the virus to take the drug and then have to get tested every few months to be sure you still don't have it and to monitor your organ functioning because it can cause kidney damage and failure - including death, among other things.  But here's the thing that made me wonder who comes up with this stuff - it says to practice safe sex while you're on the drug, using condoms.

Um, wouldn't that help prevent getting the virus too?  And it causes no threat to your organs and life.  So, why is the drug needed?

Maybe it's just me but that falls in the category of the risk of the side effects aren't worth the potential benefits - especially considering you can achieve the same results in other, much safer, ways.

Yet, I'm sure there are people that see that and call their doctors, asking to prescribe the drugs for them . . . just to be safe.  Crazy!

Book Review - Friends Lovers and the Big Terrible Thing

 

I stayed up until almost 2:00 a.m. last night to finish reading Matthew Perry's autobiography.  It was very compelling reading.  But in the interest of full disclosure, I hadn't intended to read his book at all.  I've always liked him in the roles he played but I didn't think I wanted to read a book about addiction.  Plus, when he did his interviews when the book came out, he looked like he was in need of a bath - in all of them because his hair always looked greasy.  On top of that, he talked about making out with Valerie Bertinelli when her husband was ten feet away from them, although I may have read that in articles about the book - pre-release.  Anyway, the point is, if he hadn't died, I probably wouldn't have read his book and it's a book worth reading, in my opinion.

I'm not an alcoholic or a drug addict but I do believe it's a disease that is hard to keep in "remission".  It's easy for a non-addict to say that you just shouldn't take that first drink but it's not that easy for the addict and Matthew goes into painstaking detail about his battle with booze and drugs.  He talks about his abandonment issues and how he wanted to fill the hole he felt in his life and he used booze and drugs to try to fill it.  He'd wanted fame because he thought that would do the trick but it didn't.  He kept meeting wonderful women but would break up with them before they could break up with him.  It was a pretty sad existence. 

Lisa Kudrow wrote the forward and she said she hated being asked how he was in interviews because the truth was, she didn't know.  Plus, she didn't feel it was her story to tell.  She also felt that NOT responding was bad too so she said she typically said something along the lines of "I think he's okay" and left it at that.  She said that now we all knew.  Because of the spacing in the ebook, the "from him" was on the next page.  The "now we all knew" seemed prophetic, given his death.

Matthew also said some things that seemed prophetic, as well.  It was eerie reading these things after his death. Chilling really.

He told a story how at one point he was in Switzerland and was being prescribed a certain dose of a drug.  He was told his doctor in the US would give him the same dose when he got home.  He chartered a plane, paying $175,000 to do so, and came home.  His doctor said he'd only give him a small fraction of what he could get in Switzerland, so he paid another $175,000 to go back to Switzerland.  That's what addiction can do to you.

One of the stories that bothered me most was one from a couple of years ago.  His bowels had already exploded and he'd had a number of surgeries but he was still smoking.  He started hearing some wheezing and made a doctor's appointment.  He figured he had a bronchial infection but turns out his years of smoking had done a number on his lungs.  He was told he needed to stop smoking immediately - that day - or he would die at 60.  The doctor told him he could live until his 80s if he stopped.  Stopping smoking proved challenging for him (a hypnotist was involved - twice) but he quit (and nothing was said to say he went back to it either).  He said that quitting cigarettes was harder than quitting drugs.  I've heard that before and think it's probably true (but have no firsthand experience with either).  But what bothered me is that he didn't make it until 60 - he was six years away from it when he died.

Knowing how it all ended, it was sad reading but I do think important.  He wanted to be more remembered for helping addicts (Hank Azaria credits Matthew with getting him sober) get sober than anything else and I hope he will be.  He thought writing this book might help others, I think it will.

I highly recommend it.

Dancing with the Stars Most Memorable Week

 I watched Dancing with the Stars last night and then watched the dances again earlier today.

Last night the stars recalled their most memorable years and then danced to them, telling the story of that year and what it meant to them.

I'm just going to go on record as saying, no one should be sent home on most memorable year night - period.  These people pour their hearts out with their stories and then again on the dance floor, and then one couple is sent home.  It's heartbreaking to see that.  They should let the votes carry over to the next week and send TWO couples home then.  But not on most memorable year night.  It's just wrong.

SPOILER ALERT!!!  I'm going to talk about who went home so if you haven't watched and don't want to know, stop reading now!  SPOILER ALERT!!!

The last three couples standing were Mira Sorvino, Alyson Hannigan and Harry (whose last name I don't know).  They were also the three bottom scorers of the night with Harry at the bottom, Alyson three points higher and Mira one point higher than Alyson. 

I think I mentioned last week that I vote for Mira and Alyson and I did again last night.  (I also vote for Barry but he had a great dance and scored a 24 last night, which was two points higher than Mira.)

Something I've noticed over the years though, is that a man who can't dance can go further in the competition than he deserves because women do most of the voting and they'll vote for a cute male who can't dance before they vote for a woman who can dance.  And I think they did that last night because Harry wasn't the one who went home, even though he deserved to, based on the scores the judges gave him.

Mira was the one who went home last night.  The part that was hard for me was that her memorable year was the year her daughter was born - and her daughter joined her in the dance!  The judges talked about the humor in the dance (which I didn't pick up on - even the second time I watched it) and said how good and sweet it was, etc.  She got her best score yet with the dance.  I thought it was a good dance, deserving of better scores than it got but I hated seeing her go home on a dance that was essentially dedicated to her daughter and one in which that daughter participated in the dance.

I'll just say it again, no one should be sent home on most memorable year week!

Dancing with the Stars

 This season of Dancing with the Stars has had some controversy.  The first thing I heard about the controversy was that one of the contestants had some sort of scandal (I don't remember specifics - domestic abuse, sexual assault?  I really don't remember) that outraged people that he would be allowed on the show.  I don't know all the names but his first name is Adrian, I believe.  Anyway, there were posts online about how the professional should've declined to dance with him, etc. but it moved forward anyway.

Then came the scandal of one of the contestants (I believe his name is Matt something - from Veep) saying they were backing out because of the writer's strike.  The writer's came to an agreement right before the premiere so he danced on night one, and was promptly sent home.  I don't remember his dance and couldn't tell you who his partner was (Peta maybe?).  Then the rumblings online were that he was unfairly sent home because he had briefly walked out - that it was political.  Then that got put behind us.

I watched this past Tuesday's episode but, to be honest, it didn't get my full attention when it was on live.  I record it and decided not to delete it after watching it because I wanted to go back and watch the dances again to see what I had missed and what I thought about who went home.  

**SPOILER ALERT**  If you have not watched it yet and don't want to know who went home, stop reading now!  **SPOILER ALERT**

Adrian was sent home on Tuesday.  When I went back and watched the dancing for the night, his actually was one of the best of the night, in my opinion.  I believe his dance was the Viennese Waltz and it was so smooth and graceful and lovely to watch - and I say this as someone who has wanted him to go home since I heard about his "scandal" (that I can't remember exactly what it was).  I felt his scores were low for his performance (he got all 7s for a score of 21), but I also felt others got scores lower than they deserved too.  Anyway, there were at least 3 - maybe 4 or even 5 - people with lower scores than he got and he was in a three way tie with the score he had gotten, but he was the one sent home.  It kind of surprised me.  Even though I wanted him to go home, he didn't deserve to go home on that dance.  But I guess that's the nature of the show?

Anyway, I read an article today that Charity (I think she recently was the Bachelorette - I haven't watched that in years so can't say with a certainty) was dissatisfied with her scores from the other night - she felt she deserved higher scores (she got all 8s from the judges for a score of 24).  Her partner (Artem) said he felt the scores were good but said something to the effect that there wasn't any constructive criticism given so it's hard to know what to work on from here (I would have to go back and see what was said because I don't usually retain that after it's given, although Adrian did get great feedback from his dance - I believe Derek even stood up and applauded him . . . and then he went home, but I digress).  Thing is, historically, when contestants publicly complain about their scores, they don't typically last on the show much longer, with most going home the very next week.  The judges give their feedback based on the actual dance but the viewers' voting is a popularity contest and most viewers don't seem to like it when contestants think they're better than they may be and vote accordingly.  That said, I would be okay if she went home next week.

Last thing I will say, I've been voting for Mira Sorvino every week (her, Barry Williams and Alyson Hannigan have been getting my votes every week).  Last week she danced the rumba.  For me, the rumba is probably my least favorite dance because unless it's danced by two professionals, it - to me - looks clunky.  It's a slow and sensual dance.  Mira was dissatisfied with her scores (it was shown in her package before this week's dance - I didn't see anything else come out publicly) because she thought it had been her best dance so far.  For me, I felt that she got the steps and movements down well but the problem for me was that I didn't believe the "sensual" part of the dance, which is key and very important to the reception the dance gets, at least in my opinion.  For that reason, I didn't agree that it was her best dance.  She seemed to be concentrating on the steps and movements - which again, she did well - but lost a key component to the dance, again, in my opinion.  This week, however, she did very well, in my opinion.  I think she did a waltz (maybe the Viennese Waltz? can't remember for certain).  She was one of them that I thought deserved better scores (she was one that tied with Adrian - who went home).

In any event, that's my very limited recap of the show so far this season.  I still enjoy the show but feel like I know fewer and fewer of the contestants each season but can say with a certainty that I don't care for it when the contestants complain about the scores they get because I don't believe the judges skew the scores for particular contestants, even when I don't always agree with the scores they dole out.

Doggy Daycare

 A few weeks ago I was offered an incredible opportunity to take a trip with friends.  It was to a country I had been scheduled to go to last year but had to cancel last minute so it was all the more exciting for that reason.  

But of course, I have dogs, which makes traveling more challenging.  On the plus side, my next door neighbor runs a kennel at her home.

I went on their website to look and see if she had openings for my pups for the trip.  It was then that I realized that the trip was a four week trip, not a three week trip like I was thinking.  Three weeks is more than I want to be away myself, much less four weeks with the dogs kenneled so I ended up passing on the trip.

BUT, I accidentally clicked on something while on the neighbor's website, which started an email exchange between me and my neighbor.  I ended up scheduling a "meet and wag" with the new addition to my family, Benji.

From there, I scheduled a couple of "overnight" visits for the boys (they weren't staying overnight though - I wanted "daycare" but her program had no openings and overnight bookings were the only way they could get daycare play time).

Then she had an opening come up in the daycare program so I took the slot.  Having a set schedule that the boys go out to play with others, I decided to make plans for those days.  I would get things done that are harder to do with them underfoot, right?  I could be out all day and not worry what might be happening at home (Benji was a little more aggressive towards Oreo than I would have liked when he first got here - he's calmed down in that regard though so it's all good now).

So, it's been four or five weeks now that they've been going to the neighbor's and the boys come home exhausted, so it's a quiet evening.  Which is a good thing because getting things done is exhausting too!  But the good news it, at least one night a week, we all sleep really well!  :)

Book Review: Save What's Left

 

I loved this book!  I started it late one evening and that's the only reason I didn't read it in one day!

 

Kathleen Deane is a woman who, due to an unexpected life event, uproots her life and moves to another state.  I totally related to this because I did this last year.  The author discloses the year Kathleen was born and it was the year before I was born so I also had that in common with the heroine of the story - similar life experiences.

 

Kathleen moved to this town because it had been "presented" to her as charming and lovely and just heaven.  (Same for where I moved - difference was I had been here before and came to that conclusion on my own and not just told that's how it was, like Kathleen.)  But when she arrives, she finds that things aren't as she believed and she finds it hard to fit in.  She ruffles a few feathers.  (seriously, with minor modifications, this could be MY story!)

 

What I liked about it is that it was relatable, at least for my situation.  It made me have to laugh at it - as well as laughing at the situation I find myself in!  It's kind of like how you find humor in someone else's "disasters" (for lack of a better word) but in this case, it was even more funny because I could see how it applied to my own situation.

 

So, I mentioned Kathleen experienced an unexpected life event that caused her to make the move, right?  Well, her situation was that her husband of thirty years left her and went on a world cruise to "find himself".  He bores of the cruise life and shows up at her house one day, unannounced, with an Airstream in her driveway that he decides to live in . . . in her driveway!  Tom (her husband) starts meeting people and everyone LOVES him - adores him even, he fits right in while Kathleen remains the town pariah.  Tom adopts a dog (Roger), that he walks daily.  Everyone loves Roger too.

Things happen and while Tom finds himself recovering from an accident and Kathleen is in the hospital for poisoning, their daughter, Hattie, shows up unexpectedly (and doesn't know her parents are dealing with medical issues).  While there, she takes up walking Roger.  When asked who she is, she tells people she's Kathleen's daughter and no one knows who Kathleen is, but they know Roger and know he belongs to Tom.  This was hysterical to me.  Kind of reminded me of What About Bob? where Bill Murray's character endears himself to everyone while Richard Dreyfuss' character is hated - I just found it funny.

The ending was a bit of a letdown but it wasn't that it was bad - it just didn't meet the high bar set by the rest of the book's story, in my opinion.  There is more to the story than I've conveyed here but I really enjoyed it and it made me laugh - a LOT.  I'd recommend it to anyone who has picked up their life and moved somewhere new or even if you've just considered picking up your life and moving, or if you just want to laugh.  It was a fun read!  😀

Book Review - Central Park West

I hadn't intended to read James Comey's book, Central Park West but I did put a hold on an ebook copy at the library.  There weren't many people in line for the ebook copy and there were no people in line for the TWENTY THREE copies of the audio book the library had gotten copies of, which I found interesting.  By the time the library emailed me that a copy of the ebook was available, I decided to check it out.  The reviews on amazon were good.  There was a one star review but the review was basically "I don't like James Comey" with nothing about the book so I took that with a grain of salt.

Very early on I noticed something that continued throughout the book - he "head hopped" . . . a LOT.  And the writing was bad, in my opinion.  The first head hopping incident I came to, I thought I had zoned out and missed the scene change for the new head we were in, storytelling-wise.  So I went back to see where I lost the thread, only to realize, I hadn't missed the scene change - he just changed points of view mid-scene.  In at least one instance, he did this mid-paragraph!  It was very distracting.  I've been told that only Nora Roberts can successfully head hop.  I've met Nora Roberts and James Comey is no Nora Roberts!

There were a lot of "data dumps" as well. We're talking data dumps that added NOTHING to the story, literally nothing!

He would describe things - like rooms - without the benefit of anyone's point of view.  It wouldn't be something like "Louise felt the history of the courthouse,, every time she entered the majestic building" followed by a description of the building and what struck her most about it and what she thought about it.  No, he would start with a data dump about the building - sans description - before going into Louise's point of view . . . in the same scene.

 

For the record, I don't think "Louise" was one of his characters but they were so unmemorable that I don't recall any of the character's names!  Which brings me to another point.  I like character driven stories.  If I don't care about the characters, I'm not likely to like the book.  There wasn't one single character that I found sympathetic in the book.  It's a murder mystery / thriller and I couldn't have cared less who did the killing or why.  I only kept reading because I figured it HAD to get better.  It did not.

The characters in the book made me question his competence as our attorney general (and I know he no longer is).  He said his wife corrected some things he got wrong in processes and procedures (I guess she holds some position in the judicial system?).  Shouldn't a former AG know those things?

Books borrowed from the library can only be borrowed for two weeks at a time.  Ebooks get snatched back at the end of that time, whether you've finished the book or not.  I was so disinterested in the book that I didn't think I would be able to finish in time so I thought I'd nab one of the 23 copies of the audio book, only to discover that the library had chosen not to keep those versions (I guess since no one seemed interested in them) and was literally trying to finish the book with minutes left before it was snatched back.

I did finish the book and all I can say is, I wish I could get the time I wasted on reading it back.  Not a book I would recommend and I don't understand all the high ratings it has gotten on amazon.  The one star review was pretty accurate and I don't think that person even read the book

Book Review: The Last Thing He Told Me

I recently saw Jennifer Garner give an interview for a new show she's in on AppleTV (there are way too many streaming services!!!! but I digress).  She talked about how her character's husband disappears and leaves behind his daughter, who doesn't get along with Jennifer's character.  The two try to find her husband and have to rely on one another and form a bond. 

 

 

It's not one of those stories that necessarily grabs you instantly but it was mildly interesting and so I put a hold on the book it was based on at the library.  When it first became available to me I was reading something else and didn't check it out.  You have three days to check it out and the first time - only the first time - they hold your place and put you next in line for the book, although you have to wait at least a week.

 

The second time it came up, I knew if I didn't check it out or delay delivery (something you can do indefinitely, so long as you re-book it within the three days you have to check it out), I'd go to the end of the line and the line had gotten exceedingly long since I'd first added my name to the list.  I still wasn't ready though so I pushed it back one week.

 

The third time it became available, I checked it out.  That was this past Friday.  I had an hour meeting from 2-3 Friday afternoon and I started reading the book around 1:00.  

 

I finished it before I went to bed and I did other things besides the meeting, such as walking the dogs, cooking dinner and cleaning.  Those were all things I had to do but I didn't want to

 because I didn't want to put the book down.  It was so good! 

The story is told from the perspective of the wife, Hannah.  The day starts off as any other day but a 12-year old girl brings Hannah a note from her husband, Owen.  It just says protect her.  She knows he means his daughter, Bailey, but she doesn't understand what is going on.  Particularly when a US Marshall shows up at her door saying things that make no sense to her.  He is followed by two FBI agents and news reports about the company Owen works being in serious legal jeopardy.

Things look bad for Owen but Hannah is determined to find out where he is and what exactly is going on, particularly given the note and "package" Owen left for Bailey.

It's noted to be a fast paced with twists and turns in the plot - all true.

It was a very good book and very well told story.  There was one thing that bothered me but it is the final (or one of the final anyway) plot twists so I can't tell it here.  It bothered me because much was told about Hannah's background and she makes a decision that is counter to that history - not something I felt was in line with what we'd previously been told about the character.  But they did tie up loose ends and had a satisfying conclusion to the story overall.

I highly recommend it.

The Maid's Diary - Book Review

I recently read The Maid's Diary by Loreth Anne White.  It was a "amazon's first" offering that interested me and, unlike most of the books I get from there, I actually read it.  Here is the amazon blurb on it:

Kit Darling is a maid with a snooping problem. She’s the “invisible girl,” compelled to poke into her wealthy clients’ closely guarded lives. It’s a harmless hobby until Kit sees something she can’t unsee in the home of her brand-new clients: a secret so dark it could destroy the privileged couple expecting their first child. This makes Kit dangerous to the couple. In turn, it makes the couple—who might kill to keep their secret—dangerous to Kit.

When homicide cop Mallory Van Alst is called to a scene at a luxury waterfront home known as the Glass House, she’s confronted with evidence of a violent attack so bloody it’s improbable the victim is alive. But there’s no body. The homeowners are gone. And their maid is missing. The only witness is the elderly woman next door, who woke to screams in the night. The neighbor was also the last person to see Kit Darling alive.

As Mal begins to uncover the secret that has sent the lives of everyone involved on a devious and inescapable collision course, she realizes that nothing is quite as it seems. And no one escapes their past.

 

That blurb got my attention but the writing made me not want to put the book down - I wanted to know what happened next!  I needed to know how it played out.  I started the book late one day and finished it the next day.

Funnily enough, there was one point where I had this wild thought about what was going on but quickly dismissed it as too farfetched.  But wouldn't you know it, that was what was going on!  Normally, if I can guess what's going on and I have even the faintest thought that it's farfetched, that would put me off but the author so skillfully wrote the story in a way that made it believable and not as farfetched as you might have thought - or as I had thought.  It's funny how that works, isn't it?

I really enjoyed this book and would recommend it to anyone looking for an unexpected mystery / thriller.  I don't think you'll be disappointed.  :)

Hiding in plain sight

 When I talk to people on the phone and it relates in some way to customer service, I typically take notes on the call.  Things like, who I talked to and what they told me.  Oftentimes (but not always) I will also note the time and date, in case I need that information in the future.

Well, almost two years ago I had a conversation with someone.  I remembered what they told me but not who I spoke with.  I wasn't sure if I had made note of who I had talked to.  I had talked to a number of people during this time and knew I had taken notes on a lot of the calls but wasn't sure I had in this particular instance.

 

Several months ago I reached out to this "business" to follow up.  I was stonewalled on the call so finding out if I had noted the name of who I spoke to became all the more important.  Periodically I would do a search for it but always came up short.  It was frustrating because there was other information from the notebook I wanted to find as well.

 

Yesterday I was on a mission to find this notebook that may - or may not - have the information I needed.  I was like a tornado, leaving messes wherever I looked and getting more and more frustrated when I wasn't finding it.

 

 Lately, I've been working with two notebooks - a large (or normal size) one and a small (9.5x6 inch) one.  On a lark, I decided to see if it was possible that the notes were in the large notebook because I would've bet everything I had that the notes were in a large notebook.  The notes I had taken at the time were at the back of a notebook, so I started there.  In the large notebook I did find notes that I had taken around that time but not what I needed - and not all of what I knew I had taken notes on.

I was at the point where I was convinced I had thrown out he notebook by mistake when I decided to look at the smaller notebook - convinced I wouldn't find anything and . . . there was the information I needed!  It's been within arms length this whole time and actually been used with some regularity!  Hiding in plain sight!

Maybe my dog is offended

 As previously mentioned, I'm learning Italian from CDs I bought more than six years ago.  I've been doing the lessons five days a week (Monday-Friday) and stay on the same lesson for the week to help ensure I'm absorbing the information.

Well, my dog doesn't seem to like it.  He literally gets up and leaves the room when I start the lesson, and comes back when I'm done.

Yesterday he had burrowed himself under the throw on the sofa and was snuggled up to me.  He'd just gotten into position and I hit play for the lesson and all they said was "this is lesson 5" and he came out from under the throw and stormed off into the bedroom, after giving me "a look".  Seriously, he gave me a look!

It occurred to me today that maybe it's the language I'm learning.  He's part chihuahua and maybe he's offended that I'm not learning the language of his roots.  Who knows?  I just know he really doesn't like it when I do my lessons!  :)

Epiphany

I was having an email exchange with my niece earlier this evening and the topic of Alaska came up and she asked me if I had ever been and she mentioned she had been offered a job there but had been told she couldn't take it because of the weather and low temperatures there so she had to decline the offer.  The way she told it, it was unclear who had said she couldn't take it but that she then declined it, well, it confused me so I asked who had told her she couldn't take the job.  Turns out it was her husband.

As I thought about this it occurred to me that that is the reason I have no desire to be married again - well one of the reasons anyway.  It seems that when it comes to "allowing" their spouse to do anything, the husbands want the final say - kind of like a parent would for their small child.  We have to get permission to do things like go places or spend money, whereas the men do whatever they want and spend as much as they want and they feel no need to clear it through their wives.

But here's where the epiphany came in (because I pretty much knew the other part), they want to play the role of parent when it comes to what we do, EXCEPT when it comes to taking care of the house.  They want to be the child that gets taken care of.  The one whose only contribution to a meal is sitting at the table (or in front of the TV).  They rarely want to help with household chores of cooking or cleaning and to them, watching their own kids is usually considered "babysitting".  But when a woman does it, it's parenting.  And they expect to receive medals if they ever pitch in at all.  Plus, we can get fussed at if we don't stay on top of "our" chores (but we can't say anything if they don't stay on top of "theirs"!).

At the end of my marriage my husband and I were working together and we only had one car so we were both away from the house all day, everyday.  One day we got home and he immediately started complaining because he thought the house was a mess.  I was stunned by the viciousness of his "complaint" but once I composed myself, I pointed out that he was home exactly the same amount of time as I had been and if he was unhappy with the cleanliness of the house he could just of as easily done something about it as I could.  That didn't stop his complaining.  A few years back I was experiencing a debilitating illness where getting out of bed was challenging for me - literally.  Cleaning was not something I was physically able to do and I remember thinking that if I was still married to that person, he would probably have complained because the house was a mess and not lifted a finger to clean it himself.  I don't miss being married to that man.

Having said all that I also want to say, I know not all men are like that but in my experience, more are than are not and I don't want to be in a relationship with someone who wants to be the boss of me but expects me to be the adult when he thinks tasks are "beneath" him.  And somehow a conversation about Alaska brought more clarity to the situation for me.  Weird how that works, isn't it?  :)

Serendipity

One of my goals this year is to get some things done that I've been putting off.  Early in the year I made a list of things I needed to do each day and checked them off . . . or not.  I "invested" in a product that I can keep the list on my refrigerator (although that's not how I originally envisioned it - but that's okay).

 

Anyway, I moved here almost a year ago (less than a week shy of that anniversary!).  One of the drawing features is the fact that there is a generator here because my other house didn't (and doesn't) have one because it's all electric - no gas for the generator.  Well, about six months ago the power went out here and the generator didn't kick in.  I called the generator guy, who told me he was headed out of town so it would be about a week before he got here.  I said that was fine and I waited.  And waited.  And waited.  I finally got a call about six weeks later with him following up to see if I needed him to come out.  Since I'd originally called, the power had gone out again but that time the generator kicked in like it was supposed to.  I told him that and told him I didn't think I needed him to come out after all, and left it at that.

At some point after that, the power went out again and the generator didn't kick in - again.  I didn't do anything about it for a long time though.  After the first of the year, I added it to my "to do" list and I called him about three weeks ago.  I believe it was on a Friday.  He said he could probably come out on Monday.  My mistake was in not asking which Monday, but I digress.  He came out ten days later to check things out.  Long story short, it was pretty messed up and needed "servicing".

Fast forward to last night, a "severe winter storm" hit here and my power went out.  According to the email I received, I lost power around 3:00 a.m. last night.  But, thanks to the service call I put in a few weeks ago, my generator kicked in.  And thank goodness because there's still no power in the area and no estimated time it will be turned back on!

 

I'm also snowed in.  Below is a snapshot of my front yard this morning.  I have a rain gauge that can read 5 or 6 inches and it is completely buried under the snow!  But thanks to my call to the generator guy, I'm nice and toasty in my house.  :)

 

 

Learning a New Language

 Way back in 2016 I bought some CDs to learn Italian.  I was planning to travel there and wanted to be able to speak the language.

Well, I cancelled the trip and set aside the CDs, always intending to go back to them and learn the language anyway.  I did take a Mediterranean cruise in 2018 and we did spend time in Italy but, I hadn't learned the language yet.

In fact, I never opened the box of CDs until last week!  I had them all these years and never opened them, much less tried to learn the language.

But I did open them last week and I have been listening to them and practicing the language.  I've decided to do one lesson a week, repeating the lesson daily so that I feel comfortable with the lesson before moving on.  I decided this after the first lesson because, frankly, I just wasn't getting it.  By the end of the week, I did feel comfortable to move on.  

Lesson two seems easier.  The first ten minutes are a repeat of lesson one and the rest is things like saying hello and good bye - phrases I was already familiar with.

I will say that there have been times where I've found myself incorporating words or phrases from other languages but for the most part, I feel I'm doing okay.

Now, having said all that, I do feel that there are times when maybe I'm saying words in correctly - some I feel I just don't have the ability to pronounce the way they're supposed to be said.  When those words enter the lesson, the video below (particularly the second scene) comes to mind.  :)